{"id":5342,"date":"2025-09-18T08:25:19","date_gmt":"2025-09-18T08:25:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/\/mag\/autozurnals-new-winter-tire-test-tested-the-new-budget-snow-specialist-3\/"},"modified":"2025-09-18T08:30:41","modified_gmt":"2025-09-18T08:30:41","slug":"novy-test-zimnich-pneumatik-od-autozurnalu-proveril-noveho-snehoveho-specialistu-z-ekonomickeho-segmentu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/testpneumatik.eu\/mag\/novy-test-zimnich-pneumatik-od-autozurnalu-proveril-noveho-snehoveho-specialistu-z-ekonomickeho-segmentu\/","title":{"rendered":"Nov\u00fd test zimn\u00edch pneumatik od Autozurnalu prov\u011b\u0159il nov\u00e9ho sn\u011bhov\u00e9ho specialistu z ekonomick\u00e9ho segmentu."},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Testovac\u00ed dny prob\u011bhly v okol\u00ed Arvidsjauru ve \u0161v\u00e9dsk\u00e9m Laponsku, kam se pr\u016fmysl ka\u017edou zimu st\u011bhuje kv\u016fli spolehliv\u00e9mu ledu, sn\u011bhu a mraz\u016fm. Startovn\u00ed pole kombinovalo budgetov\u00e9 i pr\u00e9miov\u00e9 zna\u010dky a tak\u00e9 dv\u011b \u201edvoj\u010data\u201c se stejn\u00fdm dez\u00e9nem: Kormoran SUV Snow a Riken SUV Snow (oboje pod k\u0159\u00eddly Michelin a vyr\u00e1b\u011bn\u00e9 v Srbsku). Zbytek sestavy: Barum Polaris 6 (<a href=\"\/magpost\/3997\">nov\u00fd \u010desk\u00fd model n\u00e1le\u017eej\u00edc\u00ed do skupiny Continental, jak jsme psali d\u0159\u00edve<\/a>), Michelin Alpin 7 (zcela nov\u00e1 pr\u00e9miov\u00e1), Tomket Snowroad SUV 3 (prezentovan\u00e1 jako \u010desk\u00e1, v\u00fdroba v \u010c\u00edn\u011b), Lassa Competus Winter 2+ (TR) a CEAT WinterDrive SUV (IN).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nejprve k hmotnosti \u2013 Barum a Michelin vy\u0161ly v\u00fdrazn\u011b lehk\u00e9, p\u0159i\u010dem\u017e Michelin m\u011bl nejleh\u010d\u00ed pl\u00e1\u0161\u0165 (~10,1 kg) a Barum byl druh\u00fd nejleh\u010d\u00ed; Tomket st\u00e1l na opa\u010dn\u00e9m konci (\u224812,7 kg). Ty rozd\u00edly v neodpru\u017een\u00e9 hmot\u011b nejsou jen akademick\u00e9\u2014leh\u010d\u00ed pneumatiky pom\u00e1haj\u00ed p\u0159esnosti \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed a komfortu na rozbit\u00fdch zimn\u00edch povr\u0161\u00edch. Co se t\u00fd\u010de konstrukce, dez\u00e9n Michelin zjevn\u011b vych\u00e1z\u00ed z V-uspo\u0159\u00e1d\u00e1n\u00ed CrossClimate, ale s hust\u00fdm zimn\u00edm lamelov\u00e1n\u00edm, aby bloky z\u016fstaly \u201e\u017eiv\u00e9\u201c v n\u00edzk\u00fdch teplot\u00e1ch.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Testovan\u00fd rozm\u011br: 215\/65 R17; vozy jako Tiguan, Karoq, Tucson, Sportage<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Zaj\u00edmavosti pole: Michelin Alpin 7 (novinka), Barum Polaris 6 (novinka CZ), CEAT &amp; Lassa jako v\u00fdhodn\u00e9 tipy; Kormoran &amp; Riken jsou t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 identick\u00e1 dvoj\u010data<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Sn\u00edh vypr\u00e1v\u011bl nejzaj\u00edmav\u011bj\u0161\u00ed p\u0159\u00edb\u011bh. Barum dominoval: nejlep\u0161\u00ed ve sn\u011bhov\u00e9m brzd\u011bn\u00ed, zrychlen\u00ed a trakci a druh\u00fd v ovladatelnosti na sn\u011bhu; rozptyl mezi nejlep\u0161\u00edm a nejslab\u0161\u00edm ve sn\u011bhov\u00e9m brzd\u011bn\u00ed z 50 km\/h byl jen 1,6 m (Barum zastavil na 24,7 m; Tomket pot\u0159eboval 26,3 m). Michelin se na sn\u011bhu dr\u017eel uprost\u0159ed pole\u2014p\u0159esn\u011b to, co \u010dek\u00e1te od konstrukce hon\u00edc\u00ed rovnov\u00e1hu na v\u0161ech povr\u0161\u00edch m\u00edsto sn\u011bhov\u00e9 specializace\u2014p\u0159esto zajel siln\u00fd \u010das v ovladatelnosti na sn\u011bhu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Na mokru Michelin obr\u00e1til trend a prost\u011b v\u0161em ujel. Veden\u00ed v brzd\u011bn\u00ed na mokru (52,4 m ze 100 km\/h), v\u00fdhra v pod\u00e9ln\u00e9m aquaplaningu a prvn\u00ed m\u00edsto v ovladatelnosti na mokru. CEAT p\u0159ekvapil jako druh\u00fd v brzd\u011bn\u00ed na mokru (55,2 m), zat\u00edmco Lassa se opakovan\u011b objevovala v \u010deln\u00ed skupin\u011b nap\u0159\u00ed\u010d mokr\u00fdmi discipl\u00ednami, v\u010detn\u011b druh\u00e9ho m\u00edsta v pod\u00e9ln\u00e9m aquaplaningu. Barum m\u011bl na mokru sm\u00ed\u0161en\u00e9 v\u00fdsledky, ale vyhr\u00e1l p\u0159\u00ed\u010dn\u00fd aquaplaning a v ovladatelnosti na mokru byl t\u011bsn\u011b za trojic\u00ed Michelin\/Lassa\/CEAT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Sn\u00edh: Barum #1 celkov\u011b na sn\u011bhu; Michelin uprost\u0159ed, ale uhlazen\u00fd (siln\u00e1 ovladatelnost na sn\u011bhu)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Mokro: Michelin jasn\u00e1 #1; CEAT a Lassa cenov\u011b v\u00fdhodn\u00e9 hv\u011bzdy; Barum v\u00edt\u011bz\u00ed v p\u0159\u00ed\u010dn\u00e9m aquaplaningu<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Sucho bylo m\u00edstem, kde se Michelin\u016fv \u201evyv\u00e1\u017een\u00fd v\u0161ude\u201c p\u0159\u00edstup znovu z\u00faro\u010dil. Vyhr\u00e1l nebo sd\u00edlel \u010dela v brzd\u011bn\u00ed na suchu (rem\u00edza s CEAT na 44,9 m ze 100 km\/h) a z\u00edskal prvenstv\u00ed v ovladatelnosti na suchu. Tomket, p\u0159esto\u017ee t\u00e1pal na sn\u011bhu i mokru, vypadal na such\u00e9 dynamice solidn\u011b (t\u0159et\u00ed na suchu celkov\u011b), co\u017e odpov\u00edd\u00e1 mnoha budgetov\u00fdm pneumatik\u00e1m lad\u011bn\u00fdm sp\u00ed\u0161 na tepl\u00fd asfalt ne\u017e na p\u0159ilnavost na vodn\u00edm filmu \u010di uje\u017ed\u011bn\u00e9m sn\u011bhu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Za zm\u00ednku stoj\u00ed blok komfort\/efektivita. Barum exceloval ve valiv\u00e9m odporu a vn\u011bj\u0161\u00edm hluku (p\u0159i 50 i 80 km\/h), Michelin byl v RR hned za n\u00edm a na stupn\u00edch v\u00edt\u011bz\u016f v hluku. Pro denn\u00ed provoz\u2014spot\u0159ebu paliva\/dojezd a ticho v kabin\u011b\u2014na tom z\u00e1le\u017e\u00ed, zvl\u00e1\u0161\u0165 u t\u011b\u017e\u0161\u00edch SUV, kde i mal\u00e9 zisky ve valiv\u00e9m odporu znamenaj\u00ed re\u00e1ln\u00e9 \u00faspory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Sucho: Michelin v\u00edt\u011bz\u00ed; CEAT se s Michelinem d\u011bl\u00ed o brzd\u011bn\u00ed na suchu; jedin\u00fd sv\u011btl\u00fd bod Tomketu je sucho<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>NVH a efektivita: Barum v\u00edt\u011bz\u00ed ve valiv\u00e9m odporu i vn\u011bj\u0161\u00edm hluku; Michelin n\u00e1sleduje<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>K t\u011bm \u201edvoj\u010dat\u016fm\u201c: Kormoran vs Riken. P\u0159i t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 identick\u00e9m dez\u00e9nu, hmotnosti i v\u00fdrob\u011b se jejich v\u00fdsledky nap\u0159\u00ed\u010d discipl\u00ednami t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 p\u0159ekr\u00fdvaly, co\u017e potvrzuje, \u017ee jde v podstat\u011b o stejn\u00fd recept s jin\u00fdmi bo\u010dnicemi. Na sn\u011bhu a mokru sed\u011bly t\u011bsn\u011b za l\u00eddry\u2014solidn\u00ed, p\u0159edv\u00eddateln\u00e9 a dobr\u00e1 hodnota, pokud m\u00e1te spr\u00e1vn\u011b nastaven\u00e1 o\u010dek\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Tomket skon\u010dil celkov\u011b posledn\u00ed.<\/strong> Pneumatika na mokru jednodu\u0161e propadla (nap\u0159. brzd\u011bn\u00ed na mokru 67,2 m ze 100 km\/h\u2014kdy\u017e Michelin u\u017e st\u00e1l, Tomket se je\u0161t\u011b pohyboval ~47 km\/h). Zaost\u00e1val tak\u00e9 na sn\u011bhu. Pokud si zvol\u00edte jen jeho v\u00fdkon na suchu, minete \u0161ir\u0161\u00ed bezpe\u010dnostn\u00ed obraz; zima je o nejhor\u0161\u00edch dnech a pr\u00e1v\u011b tam je deficit Tomketu p\u0159\u00edli\u0161 velk\u00fd na to, aby \u0161el ignorovat.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Kormoran &amp; Riken: dle o\u010dek\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 identick\u00fd v\u00fdkon, st\u0159ed pole ve v\u011bt\u0161in\u011b test\u016f<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Tomket: siln\u00e9 sucho, ale velk\u00e1 bezpe\u010dnostn\u00ed mezera na mokru\/sn\u011bhu \u2192 nedoporu\u010deno<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Fin\u00e1ln\u00ed po\u0159ad\u00ed a z\u00e1v\u011bry (dle souhrnn\u00fdch sk\u00f3re Auto\u017eurn\u00e1lu)<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ol start=\"1\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Michelin Alpin 7 \u2014 101,1<\/strong>: V\u00edt\u011bz na mokru i na suchu, 4. na sn\u011bhu. Nejkomplexn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed zimn\u00ed SUV pneumatika zde, pokud chcete jistotu v de\u0161ti a na hol\u00e9m\/studen\u00e9m asfaltu bez ob\u011btov\u00e1n\u00ed zimn\u00edch schopnost\u00ed.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Barum Polaris 6 \u2014 100,0 (reference)<\/strong>: Absolutn\u00ed hv\u011bzda na sn\u011bhu, 2. na suchu, 4. na mokru celkov\u011b, ale s v\u00fdraznou v\u00fdhrou v p\u0159\u00ed\u010dn\u00e9m aquaplaningu. Z\u00e1rove\u0148 nejlep\u0161\u00ed ve valiv\u00e9m odporu a vn\u011bj\u0161\u00edm hluku\u2014skv\u011bl\u00e1 ka\u017edodenn\u00ed ekonomika.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>CEAT WinterDrive SUV \u2014 99,1<\/strong>: Velk\u00e9 p\u0159ekvapen\u00ed z hlediska hodnoty; nejrychlej\u0161\u00ed v brzd\u011bn\u00ed na suchu (sd\u00edlen\u00e9), konzistentn\u011b siln\u00fd na mokru, solidn\u00ed na sn\u011bhu.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Lassa Competus Winter 2+ \u2014 98,1<\/strong>: Dal\u0161\u00ed hodnotov\u00fd performer\u20142. celkov\u011b na mokru, jinde st\u0159ed pole; spolehliv\u011b vyv\u00e1\u017een\u00e1. 5\/6) <strong>Kormoran SUV Snow \u2014 96,6<\/strong> a <strong>Riken SUV Snow \u2014 96,0<\/strong>: V podstat\u011b stejn\u00e1 pneumatika; poctiv\u00e9, p\u0159edv\u00eddateln\u00e9 zimn\u00ed chov\u00e1n\u00ed, o krok za l\u00eddry.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Tomket Snowroad SUV 3 \u2014 93,7<\/strong>: Tempo na suchu v po\u0159\u00e1dku, ale sn\u00edh a zejm\u00e9na bezpe\u010dnost na mokru podkop\u00e1vaj\u00ed celek\u2014Auto\u017eurn\u00e1l hodnot\u00ed \u201eZl\u00fd \/ Bad\u201c.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Nejlep\u0161\u00ed univerz\u00e1l: <strong>Michelin Alpin 7<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Nejlep\u0161\u00ed na sn\u00edh + n\u00edzk\u00fd valiv\u00fd odpor\/ticho: <strong>Barum Polaris 6<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Nejlep\u0161\u00ed cenov\u00e9 tipy: <strong>CEAT WinterDrive SUV<\/strong>, <strong>Lassa Competus Winter 2+<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Pozn\u00e1mky z dat (relativn\u011b k baseline Barum = 100):<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Brzd\u011bn\u00ed na mokru (100\u21920 km\/h):<\/strong> Michelin 103,6; CEAT 100,1; Lassa 100,7; Tomket 87,2<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Pod\u00e9ln\u00fd\/p\u0159\u00ed\u010dn\u00fd aquaplaning:<\/strong> Michelin 107,6\/102,1; Barum v\u00edt\u011bz\u00ed v <strong>p\u0159\u00ed\u010dn\u00e9m<\/strong> se 100 (kategori\u00e1ln\u00ed baseline)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Brzd\u011bn\u00ed na suchu (100\u21920 km\/h):<\/strong> CEAT 44,9 m (= top), Michelin tak\u00e9 44,9 m; Tomket 45,6 m; Lassa 48,3 m<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Brzd\u011bn\u00ed na mokru (100\u21920 km\/h):<\/strong> Michelin 52,4 m; CEAT 55,2 m; Lassa 55,4 m; Barum 56,3 m; Tomket 67,2 m<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Valiv\u00fd odpor a hluk:<\/strong> Barum 100\/100 (nejlep\u0161\u00ed); Michelin 101,2 RR a ~98,4 hluk (velmi dobr\u00e9)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Pokud jezd\u00edte p\u0159ev\u00e1\u017en\u011b po mokr\u00fdch a b\u0159e\u010dkov\u00fdch d\u00e1lnic\u00edch s ob\u010dasn\u00fdm sn\u011bhem, Michelin Alpin 7 je bezpe\u010dn\u00e1, jist\u00e1 volba. Pokud m\u00e1te skute\u010dn\u011b sn\u011bhov\u00e9 zimy\u2014nebo si cen\u00edte tich\u00e9ho, \u00fasporn\u00e9ho d\u00e1lni\u010dn\u00edho cestov\u00e1n\u00ed\u2014Barum Polaris 6 d\u00e1v\u00e1 velk\u00fd smysl a na suchu tak\u00e9 dr\u017e\u00ed krok. CEAT a Lassa jsou cenov\u011b v\u00fdhodn\u00e9 volby, kter\u00e9 v denn\u00edm provozu nep\u016fsob\u00ed jako kompromis. Kormoran\/Riken jsou klidn\u00e9 a p\u0159edv\u00eddateln\u00e9 volby ze st\u0159edu tabulky. Tomket? Such\u00e9 geny nedok\u00e1\u017eou vyv\u00e1\u017eit mezery na mokru a sn\u011bhu\u2014na zimn\u00ed slu\u017ebu nedoporu\u010dujeme.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Testovac\u00ed dny prob\u011bhly v okol\u00ed Arvidsjauru ve \u0161v\u00e9dsk\u00e9m Laponsku, kam se pr\u016fmysl ka\u017edou zimu st\u011bhuje kv\u016fli spolehliv\u00e9mu ledu, sn\u011bhu a mraz\u016fm. Startovn\u00ed pole kombinovalo budgetov\u00e9 i pr\u00e9miov\u00e9 zna\u010dky a tak\u00e9 dv\u011b \u201edvoj\u010data\u201c se stejn\u00fdm dez\u00e9nem: Kormoran SUV Snow a Riken SUV Snow (oboje pod k\u0159\u00eddly Michelin a vyr\u00e1b\u011bn\u00e9 v Srbsku). Zbytek sestavy: Barum Polaris 6 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5317,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5342","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/testpneumatik.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5342","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/testpneumatik.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/testpneumatik.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testpneumatik.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testpneumatik.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5342"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/testpneumatik.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5342\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5343,"href":"https:\/\/testpneumatik.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5342\/revisions\/5343"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testpneumatik.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5317"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/testpneumatik.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5342"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testpneumatik.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5342"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testpneumatik.eu\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5342"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}